Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
