Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
