Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX
