Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
