Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX
