Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
