Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
