Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
