Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
