Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
