Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
