Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
