Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
