Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
77.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
