Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
