Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
