Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19
Spinning
3000x
86.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Lexa E LT 19?
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
