Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
54.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a ball bearings of 7, while Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Regal LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
