Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
