Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Delphin BRONZ 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin BRONZ 4000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin BRONZ?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin BRONZ 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
