Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (5,5kg / 12,13lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX
