Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
65.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 535g / 18,87oz and a ergonomics of 5.91 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
