Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
