Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Shimano Catana FE 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Catana FE 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
