Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
