Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
