Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
