Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
