Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
