Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the total score (6.62 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
