Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX
