Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
