Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
