Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
