Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24.02 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
