Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 39.0 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
