Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
