Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
