Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
64.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €68.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 Legalis LT?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
