Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 Legalis LT?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa BG 6500X
