Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
