Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X
