Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
