Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
