Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
