Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
