Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
