Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
