Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX
