Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
