Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
