Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX
