Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
66.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
